
| Home | Site map |
State Records Guideline No. 10Outsourcing of Government Business – Recordkeeping IssuesIssued: 13 July 2005 (download the formal issued MS Word version 265KB) AuthorityThis guideline is issued under the provisions of Section 10A of the Archives Act 1983. Guidelines issued by the State Archivist under this Section set standards, policy, and procedures relating to the making and keeping of State records. This section also requires all relevant authorities to take all reasonable steps to comply with these guidelines, and put them into effect. Ian Pearce Table of Contents
1 PurposeThis guideline provides a series of principles concerning recordkeeping issues inherent in exercises involving the outsourcing of government agencies, functions and activities. The purpose of this guideline is to ensure that:
2 Definitionsagency - is used in this guideline to refer to all agencies, authorities, statutory offices, departments, councils and other organisations that are subject to, and defined in, the Archives Act 1983. disposal(records) - involves either the destruction of records; their transfer to the Archives Office for retention as part of the State archives; their transfer to another custodian; or some other process approved by the State Archivist which removes them from the custody of their creator or current keeper. disposal schedule- a detailed inventory of records created and stored by an agency, listed by record classes and identifying the appropriate disposal action. These comprehensive documents are formally authorised by the State Archivist and the destruction periods identified in the schedule can be acted upon without further reference to the Archives Office. outsourcing - the process by which a third party entity performs a function or activity on behalf of an agency as regulated by a contract or agreement. permanent value records - Records that must be transferred to the Archives Office 25 years after the date of creation for retention as State archives. record- a document or an object that is, or has been, made or kept by reason of any information or matter that it contains or can be obtained from it or by reason of its connection with any event person, circumstance, or thing. A document includes any printed or written material and an object includes a sound recording, coded storage device, magnetic tape or disc, microfilm, photograph, film, map, plan, or model or painting or other pictorial or graphic work. service provider - an organisation (or individual) engaged by an agency to provide a service where the facility and staff are not controlled or managed by that agency. These organisations could be private sector operations or other Federal, State or local government bodies. State record - records of State government agencies/departments, State authorities, or local authorities. These public bodies are defined in Section 3 of the Archives Act 1983. storage – the function of storing records for future retrieval and use. temporary value records - records that can be destroyed under the authority of an authorised Disposal Schedule after a minimum retention period, or once certain requirements have been met. third party entity - an organisation or individual with whom a responsible agency has contracted to perform a function or activity, or part thereof, or an organisation or individual to whom the agency, or part thereof, has been sold. The organisation may be a private or public entity. transfer of custody - involves transferring the duty of care for the ongoing physical management of records from one custodian to another. transfer of ownership - involves one party relinquishing physical, legal and, in certain instances, intellectual property rights over the record to another party. 3 More than two parties to an outsourcing exerciseWith the increasing complexity of government business, it is likely that circumstances will arise where there are more than two parties to an outsourcing exercise. This situation might arise when the administration of a database is shared between two government departments and a privatised organisation. In this case each government agency would need to ensure that the privatised organisation was aware of the recordkeeping issues that needed to be addressed. While the language used in this document reflects one to one dealings, the principles can be scaled up to include more than two parties. 4 AcknowledgementsThis guideline is based on a policy statement of the Council of Australasian Archives and Records Authorities (CAARA) which was developed with the assistance of member organisations including the Archives Office of Tasmania. 5 Controls over outsourcingThe use of legislation – agencies participating in an outsourcing exercise should establish whether the outsourcing is taking place as a result of legislation. If so, agencies should check the legislation as it may contain some provisions relating to records. Such a set of provisions may specifically exempt or include certain categories of records as part of the outsourcing exercise. These provisions must be considered when developing the contract or agreement. The use of a contract – agencies participating in an outsourcing exercise should examine the terms and definitions of a contract closely. Records may not be mentioned directly in the contract, but be intended by those drafting the contract to be included within the scope of the terms ‘assets’ ‘contract material’ or ‘Crown material’. Without precise clarification of what constitutes assets, contract material or Crown material the opportunity could arise for ambiguities over the treatment of records. If those drafting the contract do not consider that records are assets, contract material or Crown material, then the agency must ensure that the contract clarifies the rights and responsibilities of parties to the contract with regard to records. 5.1 Principle 1 -PlanningResponsibilities for making, maintaining and disposing of records of outsourced functions and activities, are included in the planning process and subsequent contracts and agreements. The process of outsourcing an agency function or activity, or part thereof, is both complex and legally focused and is generally achieved through a contract or binding service agreement. These contracts and agreements can generally cover issues such as: service levels, performance benchmarks, costs and penalties. It is far less common to find that the agreements and contracts include the source of the information that will make it possible to measure compliance, or not, with the agreements and contracts - the records. Agencies that do not ensure that records are included in the planning process, and in the agreements and contracts, may find it legally difficult, or impossible, to re-acquire records when needed. They may also find it difficult or impossible to access records when needed for administrative purposes or when required during litigation. Accordingly, agencies must ensure that responsibilities for making, maintaining and disposing of records are included in the outsourcing planning process and in agreements and contracts. Agencies should contact the Archives Office prior to the drafting of any outsourcing agreement or contract, for advice on recordkeeping issues for inclusion in the contract or agreement. Agreements or contracts controlling the outsourcing should:
5.2 Principle 2 - OwnershipOwnership of records of outsourced functions is addressed and resolved during outsourcing exercises. Failure to clarify issues surrounding the legal ownership of records, and the information they contain, in outsourcing agreements and contracts, can severely restrict the business capabilities of the third party entity and expose the agency to considerable risks. The issue of ownership extends not only to records of the agency that may be transferred to the third party entity but also to records created by the third party entity during the life of the agreement or contract. Agencies can not transfer their own records to a third party entity during an outsourcing exercise without the authorisation of the State Archivist. 5.3 Principle 3 -ControlThird party entities comply with the records management controls determined by the controlling agency. Even though an agency, function or activity has been outsourced, it is likely that a controlling agency will retain some degree of responsibility for oversight and control over the function(s) performed by the third party. This control will be best supported by the controlling agency ensuring good recordkeeping practices are observed by the third party entity. To make this possible the agency must require the third party entity to create or manage records in any manner specified by the agency. The agency may also require that the third party entity follow particular government policies and standards that were binding upon the agency prior to, or after, the outsourcing of the particular agency, function or activity. 5.4 Principle 4 - DisposalRecords of outsourced functions and activities of the agency are disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the Archives Act 1983. Disposal includes the transfer of ownership or custody of records and is not limited to the physical destruction of records. Agencies must exercise equal control over such disposal activities as those that involve the physical destruction of records particularly in exercises where an agency function or activity is being outsourced, and the relevant records may move outside the custody of the originating agency. 5.5 Principle 5 - AccessAgreement is reached between the agency and the third party entity concerning the provision of access to records of outsourced functions and activities. Within government, records are not only retained for their administrative use, they are also retained to meet legal requirements and community expectations. This access is established in archival legislation. This dual access role of records is easy to establish and maintain while the records remain in the custody of the creating agency. It is vital therefore, that agencies ensure that when an agency, function or activity is outsourced that issues of access to records held by the third party entity, are addressed. Failure to do so will make it extremely difficult for the agency (or other compliance authorities with a legitimate interest) to inspect and validate the service delivery being performed by the relevant third party entity. It may also raise, or heighten, community concerns regarding the control of personal information outside government hands. Public access should be no more or less than was previously available when the records were in the custody of the agency. 5.6 Principle 6 - StorageStorage of records of outsourced functions and activities is addressed and resolved during outsourcing exercises. Section 10 of the Archives Act 1983, requires agencies to preserve State records until they are dealt with by the Act. Agencies must ensure that the parties to the outsourcing arrangement conform to best practice in record storage and handling especially the storage principles specified in the State Records Guideline No. 11, Physical Storage of State Records. Poor, or no decisions over the storage arrangements for records will result in the loss of records of evidential value. Agency staff and members of the public will lose confidence in the integrity of such records. Agencies must therefore ensure that storage arrangements are included in the agreements and contracts governing outsourcing exercises. It is also vital that the agreements and contracts include arrangements for the storage of records at the expiry or termination of the agreement of contract. Failure to do so may result in records being destroyed through the perception that they are no longer the concern of the third party entity, or material being misplaced in the changed circumstances at the conclusion of the agreement or contract. 5.7 Principle 7 - Contract completionRecordkeeping issues are addressed upon completion of contracts or agreements. Just as agencies must ensure that the initial stages of a contract are well regulated and specified, they must also ensure that the completion, and post completion, stages of a contract are well regulated, monitored and specified. Failure to do so will result in lost information, increased risk of exposure to legal liabilities and wasted time and money. It is unlikely that a third party entity will wish to devote time and effort to records of an activity or function which it is no longer performing for the government, unless there is an initially established contractual requirement for it to do so. Agencies must therefore ensure that there is appropriate advanced planning for the management of recordkeeping issues ahead of the completion of an outsourcing contract or agreement. Where records are managed in a hurry, including boxing, listing, sentencing, transportation or migration, the risk of material of continuing value being lost or accidentally destroyed increases exponentially. An orderly end of contract or agreement process will result in good records management and fewer wasted resources, both by the third party entity and the agency. It will also substantially reduce both the agency and the third party entity’s exposure to risk. Checklist of minimum requirements
|